I always find it hard reviewing others work especially in the draft process. It makes it even more difficult when we are reading it in a blog format since you know the formatting has changed. It is interesting how each individual leaves out certain task(s) especially in a draft. We do not seem too much infuses on particular details as we do drafts. The part I do like about peer reviews is it always seems to help you understand the project a little better and provides new ideas and direction for the final version. I noticed I need to change or add to my final draft is an analysis of how and why your source allows you to better understand your purpose and audience for your final research paper. I also need to look into moving my citations to the top of my paragraphs the source I referenced showed them at the bottom so I will verify what is correct. I also may want to add a little more information to some of my sources. This I know needs to happen with a couple of them that are lacking because I need to continue research.
3/10/07, Deadline #8, HW#2 Peer Review Reflection
March 10th, 2007 · 3 Comments
Uncategorized
3 responses so far ↓
1 Sarah // Mar 11, 2007 at 12:29 am
I also view peer reviewing as a helpful tool in seeing where the project is headed. It sounds like you got some good tips out of this assignment too!
2 Michele // Mar 11, 2007 at 11:57 pm
I agree with finding it hard to review others work when it is still and draft and then adding the quirky blog formatting on top of that….hopefully in the next few word projects we will be used to that!
3 AbuNasser // Mar 19, 2007 at 4:46 pm
I think i’d be nowhere without peer reviews. I always kick my papers around to friends and family before I submit anything important anyway. A different perspective usually catches those errors that we are so used to making.
Good luck all!
Leave a Comment